SHOES • TEST PUBLISHED BY IRUNFAR HOKA

Hoka Tecton X 4

Trail running and ultra on technical terrain • Prix indicatif : $275

TESTÉ

THE SOURCE'S VERDICT

Test by iRunFar

Read the original test ↗

HOKA Hoka Tecton X 4 — Photo: iRunFar — photo published with the source article

PUBLISHED FIGURES & MANUFACTURER DATA

Key facts

Tests on several Tecton X versions (4 versions), then usage with around 340 miles on the Tecton X 3 and nearly 100 miles on the Tecton X 4, on trails…

Actual weight263 g

Heel stack height (women)39 mm

Heel stack height (men)40 mm

Heel-to-toe drop5 mm

Carbon platesparallel carbon plates

Credited protocol iRunFar • 8 October 2026 • Tests on several Tecton X versions (4 versions), then usage with around 340 miles on the Tecton X 3 and nearly 100 miles on the Tecton X 4, on trails…

Check the source ↗

Strengths noted

Very well-cushioned but light and “bouncy”, with a good balance of responsiveness/stability on technical trails.
Effective support and lockdown (midfoot lockdown) and a confident feel on varied terrain.
Good traction and performance in real-world conditions (loose dirt, embankments, wet rocks, mud, technical sections).
Upper material that drains quickly after water crossings/swimming in hot weather (fine mesh).

Limitations noted

Too much foam/cushioning for some: you feel the ground less than with a lower stack.
The sock/ankle gaiter can be a hindrance: harder to slip on and may put some people off.
High price for everyday use; “overkill” for a quick loop around the neighbourhood.

Best for? Daily training and, above all, trail-ultra racing/goal in the mountains on technical terrain; fast races where maximum cushioning and propulsion are sought.

7RUN'S SUMMARY OF THE PUBLISHED TEST

Key takeaways

According to the tester, the Hoka Tecton X 4 is a very pleasing shoe: comfortable, well-cushioned and lightweight, with lively responsiveness and a “bouncy” energy return. The tester highlights good lockdown and reliable traction on technical trails and in wet/unstable conditions, especially during water crossings. On the downside, the cushioning reduces the feel of the ground, and the gaiter can make it harder to get on; the model is also considered expensive for everyday use.

7RUN did not carry out this test. This summary rephrases iRunFar's results and the specifications published by the manufacturer. See the source for the full protocol and the tester's context.

OTHER CATEGORIES

Keep exploring the Gear Lab

All gear →